GSD Works logo
GSD Works
All Case Studies
Manufacturing

Routing and Work Centre Setup for Realistic Capacity Planning

Implementing routing and work centre data that reflects real work — so scheduling becomes a practical tool instead of a constant negotiation.

Client

Manufacturing businesses needing realistic capacity planning and better labour utilisation

Focus

Routing, work centres, run times, setup times, capacity planning

The challenge: unrealistic schedules and unreliable delivery promises

When run times, setup times, and work centre capacity are not defined properly, schedules become optimistic and delivery promises become unreliable. Teams compensate with overtime and constant rescheduling.

What we did: implement routing and work centre data that reflected real work

01

Defining run times and setup times

02

Using motion studies to validate time assumptions

What became visible

Once routing data was realistic, it became clear that some tasks could be split into two linked activities:

A higher-skilled portion of the work
A lower-skilled portion of the work

This maintained one-piece flow while allowing higher-skilled workers to focus their energy where it created the most value.

Results: higher output, less overtime, reduced bottlenecks

Higher
output with less overtime

Realistic routing data enabled better scheduling, reducing the need for overtime to meet commitments.

Reduced
bottlenecks

Labour allocation matched the true constraint, reducing bottlenecks caused by misallocated resources.

Why it matters

Capacity planning is only as good as the data behind it. When routing and work centre assumptions match reality, scheduling becomes a practical tool instead of a constant negotiation.

Facing similar challenges?

If your schedules are optimistic and delivery promises keep slipping, the data behind your capacity plan might be the problem. Let's talk.

Get in Touch